RESUMO
A major clinical challenge in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the difficulty of predicting curve progression at initial presentation. The early detection of progressive curves can offer the opportunity to better target effective non-operative treatments, reducing the need for surgery and the risks of related complications. Predictive models for the detection of scoliosis progression in subjects before growth spurt have been developed. These models accounted for geometrical parameters of the global spine and local descriptors of the scoliotic curve, but neglected contributions from biomechanical measurements such as trunk muscle activation and intervertebral loading, which could provide advantageous information. The present study exploits a musculoskeletal model of the thoracolumbar spine, developed in AnyBody software and adapted and validated for the subject-specific characterization of mild scoliosis. A dataset of 100 AIS subjects with mild scoliosis and in pre-pubertal age at first examination, and recognized as stable (60) or progressive (40) after at least 6-months follow-up period was exploited. Anthropometrical data and geometrical parameters of the spine at first examination, as well as biomechanical parameters from musculoskeletal simulation replicating relaxed upright posture were accounted for as predictors of the scoliosis progression. Predicted height and weight were used for model scaling because not available in the original dataset. Robust procedure for obtaining such parameters from radiographic images was developed by exploiting a comparable dataset with real values. Six predictive modelling approaches based on different algorithms for the binary classification of stable and progressive cases were compared. The best fitting approaches were exploited to evaluate the effect of accounting for the biomechanical parameters on the prediction of scoliosis progression. The performance of two sets of predictors was compared: accounting for anthropometrical and geometrical parameters only; considering in addition the biomechanical ones. Median accuracy of the best fitting algorithms ranged from 0.76 to 0.78. No differences were found in the classification performance by including or neglecting the biomechanical parameters. Median sensitivity was 0.75, and that of specificity ranged from 0.75 to 0.83. In conclusion, accounting for biomechanical measures did not enhance the prediction of curve progression, thus not supporting a potential clinical application at this stage.
RESUMO
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine, the aetiology and pathogenesis of which are poorly understood. Unfortunately, biomechanical data describing trunk muscle activation and intervertebral load, which can contribute to understanding the pathomechanics of the AIS spine, cannot be measured in vivo due to the invasiveness of the procedures. The present study provides the biomechanical characterization of the spinal loads in scoliotic subjects by exploiting musculoskeletal modelling approach, allowing for calculating biomechanical measures in an assigned posture. A spine model with articulated ribcage previously developed in AnyBody software was applied. The predicted outcomes were evaluated in the upright posture, depending on scoliosis severity and curve type, in a population of 132 scoliotic subjects with mild, moderate, and severe scoliosis. Radiographic-based three dimensional reconstruction of vertebral orientations and scaling of body segments and trunk muscle cross-section area guaranteed geometrical subject-specificity. Validation analysis supporting the application of the model was performed. Trunk muscles were found more activated in the convex side of the scoliotic curve, in agreement with reference in vivo measurements, with progressive increase with scoliosis severity. The intervertebral lateral shear was found positively correlated with the severity of the scoliosis, demonstrating that the transferred load is not a priori orthogonal to vertebral endplate in the frontal plane, and thus questioning the assumption of the 'follower load' approach in case of experimental or computational study on the scoliotic spine. The study opens the way for the subject-specific characterization of scoliosis in assigned loading and motion conditions.
